He speaks of Goethe's philosophy of light and the eye. His principle was that it was not the eye which revealed light, but light which created the eye.
Steiner maintains that Western Science had a choice of directions, one being highly reductionist approach promoted by that English guy whose name I forget and is now considered the father of modern science, and the approach of Goethe, which was holistic and included the mystical aspect.
In an alternate universe science went down the phenomenological road.
In that universe, in 1666 Isaac Newton, made the same discoveries as in ours, but when he got to his theory of color, he also discovers the assemblage point.
In the same universe, in the year 1637 some philosopher engages in a process of Neti Neti (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neti_neti), and simultaneous self-observation. She coins the saying; "I think I am, thought is I, I can observe the I thought, therefor I am awareness".
In this universe all of humanity are, by the year 2014 able to stop the world, and move the assemblage point at will. They learn it by no later than high school, when they learn Spectroscopy. Specifically Time Stretch Spectroscopy.
"Steiner aimed to apply his training in mathematics, science, and philosophy to produce rigorous, verifiable presentations of those experiences.[44] He believed that through freely chosen ethical disciplines and meditative training, anyone could develop the ability to experience the spiritual world, including the higher nature of oneself and others.[26] Steiner believed that such discipline and training would help a person to become a more moral, creative and free individual – free in the sense of being capable of actions motivated solely by love.[45] His philosophical ideas were affected by Franz Brentano,[26] with whom he had studied,[46] as well as by Fichte, Hegel, Schelling, and Goethe's phenomenological approach to science.[26][47][48]"
"In his commentaries on Goethe's scientific works, written between 1884 and 1897, Steiner presented Goethe's approach to science as essentially phenomenological in nature, rather than theory- or model-based. He developed this conception further in several books, The Theory of Knowledge Implicit in Goethe's World-Conception (1886) and Goethe's Conception of the World (1897), particularly emphasizing the transformation in Goethe's approach from the physical sciences, where experiment played the primary role, to plant biology, where both accurate perception and imagination was required to find the biological archetypes (Urpflanze), and postulated that Goethe had sought but been unable to fully find the further transformation in scientific thinking necessary to properly interpret and understand the animal kingdom.[86] Steiner emphasized the role of evolutionary thinking in Goethe's discovery of the intermaxillary bone in human beings; Goethe expected human anatomy to be an evolutionary transformation of animal anatomy.[86]
Steiner defended Goethe's qualitative description of color as arising synthetically from the polarity of light and darkness, in contrast to Newton's particle-based and analytic conception."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudolf_Steiner#Goethean_science