Author Topic: Quantum Physics: Superstring Theory  (Read 71 times)

Offline Josh

  • Yogi
  • ***
  • Posts: 348
  • go flower yourself
    • Invisible Acropolis
Quantum Physics: Superstring Theory
« on: April 04, 2007, 03:56:26 AM »
Superstring theory is an attempt to explain all of the particles and fundamental forces of nature in one theory by modeling them as vibrations of tiny supersymmetric strings. It is considered one of the most promising candidate theories of quantum gravity. Superstring theory is a shorthand for supersymmetric string theory because unlike bosonic string theory, it is the version of string theory that incorporates fermions and supersymmetry.

Think of a guitar string that has been tuned by stretching the string under tension across the guitar. Depending on how the string is plucked and how much tension is in the string, different musical notes will be created by the string. These musical notes could be said to be excitation modes of that guitar string under tension.

. In a similar manner, in string theory, the elementary particles we observe in particle accelerators could be thought of as the "musical notes" or excitation modes of elementary strings.

. In string theory, as in guitar playing, the string must be stretched under tension in order to become excited. However, the strings in string theory are floating in spacetime, they aren't tied down to a guitar. Nonetheless, they have tension. The string tension in string theory is denoted by the quantity 1/(2 p a'), where a' is pronounced "alpha prime"and is equal to the square of the string length scale.

. If string theory is to be a theory of quantum gravity, then the average size of a string should be somewhere near the length scale of quantum gravity, called the Planck length, which is about 10-33 centimeters, or about a millionth of a billionth of a billionth of a billionth of a centimeter. Unfortunately, this means that strings are way too small to see by current or expected particle physics technology (or financing!!) and so string theorists must devise more clever methods to test the theory than just looking for little strings in particle experiments.

. String theories are classified according to whether or not the strings are required to be closed loops, and whether or not the particle spectrum includes fermions. In order to include fermions in string theory, there must be a special kind of symmetry called supersymmetry, which means for every boson (particle that transmits a force) there is a corresponding fermion (particle that makes up matter). So supersymmetry relates the particles that transmit forces to the particles that make up matter.

. Supersymmetric partners to to currently known particles have not been observed in particle experiments, but theorists believe this is because supersymmetric particles are too massive to be detected at current accelerators. Particle accelerators could be on the verge of finding evidence for high energy supersymmetry in the next decade. Evidence for supersymmetry at high energy would be compelling evidence that string theory was a good mathematical model for Nature at the smallest distance scales.

The deepest problem in theoretical physics is harmonizing the theory of general relativity, which describes gravitation and applies to large-scale structures (stars, galaxies, super clusters), with quantum mechanics, which describes the other three fundamental forces acting on the atomic scale.

The development of a quantum field theory of a force invariably results in infinite (and therefore useless) probabilities. Physicists have developed mathematical techniques (renormalization) to eliminate these infinities which work for three of the four fundamental forces - electromagnetic, strong nuclear and weak nuclear forces - but not for gravity. The development of a quantum theory of gravity must therefore come about by different means than those used for the other forces.

The basic idea is that the fundamental constituents of reality are strings of the Planck length which vibrate at resonant frequencies. Every string in theory has a unique resonance, or harmonic. Different harmonics determine different fundamental forces. The tension in a string is on the order of the Planck force (1044 newtons). The graviton (the proposed messenger particle of the gravitational force), for example, is predicted by the theory to be a string with wave amplitude zero. Another key insight provided by the theory is that no measurable differences can be detected between strings that wrap around dimensions smaller than themselves and those that move along larger dimensions (i.e., effects in a dimension of size R equal those whose size is 1/R). Singularities are avoided because the observed consequences of "big crunches" never reach zero size. In fact, should the universe begin a "big crunch" sort of process, string theory dictates that the universe could never be smaller than the size of a string, at which point it would actually begin expanding.

Our physical space is observed to have only three large dimensions - and taken together with time as the fourth dimension - a physical theory must take this into account. However, nothing prevents a theory from including more than 4 dimensions, per se. In the case of string theory, consistency requires spacetime to have 10, 11 or 26 dimensions. The conflict between observation and theory is resolved by making the unobserved dimensions compactified.

Our minds have difficulty visualizing higher dimensions because we can only move in three spatial dimensions. Even then, we only see in 2+1 dimensions; vision in 3 dimensions would allow one to see all sides (including the inside) of an object simultaneously. One way of dealing with this limitation is not to try to visualize higher dimensions at all, but just to think of them as extra numbers in the equations that describe the way the world works. This opens the question of whether these 'extra numbers' can be investigated directly in any experiment (which must show different results in 1, 2, or 2+1 dimensions to a human scientist). This, in turn, raises the question of whether models that rely on such abstract modelling (and potentially impossibly huge experimental apparatus) can be considered 'scientific'. 6-dimensional Calabi-Yau shapes can account for the additional dimensions required by superstring theory.

Superstring theory is not the first theory to propose extra spatial dimensions; see Kaluza-Klein theory. Modern string theory relies on the mathematics of folds, knots, and topology, which was largely developed after Kaluza and Klein, and has made physical theories relying on extra dimensions much more credible.
Other is.  Self must struggle to exist.

- Brian George

Offline tommy2

  • Pir
  • ****
  • Posts: 706
  • An opportunity to achieve a great end.
Re: Quantum Physics: Superstring Theory
« Reply #1 on: April 04, 2007, 05:03:57 AM »
How would this theory, in your opinion, apply to the concept of luminous fibers of awareness?  Or, in other words, could the different resonating frequencies, or dimensions, have a direct link to the 1st, 2nd and 3rd attenton?

In my own sensings, there are surely unbreakable connections with basic DNA structuring involved in these varying string vibrations.  I say this because of my intuiting even standard hierarchical arrangements of all energetic vibratiions.

Do you feel such quantum paralells can be drawn in, at least, a Nagual sense?
t2f

Offline Josh

  • Yogi
  • ***
  • Posts: 348
  • go flower yourself
    • Invisible Acropolis
Re: Quantum Physics: personal observations
« Reply #2 on: April 04, 2007, 12:38:25 PM »
Its certainly an intriguing parallel.  My own personal experience with the luminous fibers of existence is hard to translate into a mathematical theory like these fellows are doing.  I personally dont have the inclination to sit there and do all that calculation.  My first instinct was to go out and explore them first hand, directly.

However, it is common knowledge that matter and energy are all just different ranges of vibration - so called "solid" matter just being particles a much slower rate of frequency than less substantial particles such as light, which has the paradoxical status of being both wave and particle... yet still travels at a measureable speed.  It is also common knowledge that matter itself is not really solid at all, there being vast amounts of "empty" space between molecules, between atoms, between protons, neutrons and electrons.  The only reason we think matter is solid is because our minds fool us that way, thru sense perceptions and/or concepts, etc.

Quantum physics came about in regards to states, energies, particles etc. that are behind existence, at a more subtle level than the usual cartesian/newtonian models of science, i.e. "an apple falls on my head.. ive discovered gravity!".  In particular the photon wave/particle duality and furthermore observations of superluminal connections are key components.  "Superluminal" being beyond the speed of light, but in actuality meaning instantaneous across any amount of space/time. 

Current technology has been hampered by govt regulations in gaining necessary funding/time/legal allowances to properly engineer equiment to carry out necessary tests to bring this knowledge out of its "theoretical" basis and into the realm of "fact".  At least, as far as these people are concerned.

It has become cliche in some circles, but the parallels of quantum physics and other esoteric systems of knowledge like Toltec, Taoist, Buddhist, etc. is pretty hard to miss.  The gun-jumping part notwithstanding, its somewhat encouraging that the overall knowledge level of the general populace is at least moving forward.  Of course it may take quite a while before quantum science replaces the current model of science in terms of the average person on the street, but that is how it happens.  Centuries ago, people had no clue about most of the things people know these days (and take for granted).

But yes, DNA is indeed at a intrinsically subtle layer of energy/matter correllation.  How else could a tiny baby grow into a complete adult person?  Thats at least 100lbs of weight, and of course alot more mass.  Also the shape of features and limbs, organs, etc. is completely different.  And yet the full range of the DNA molecules are there from the beginning. 

As far as how the luminous fibers interact with DNA, that is something that has to be experienced.  Its just too much to put into concepts.  Needless to say that when you do experience it, you will be privy to awareness to which an entire physical life is as one breath.  The spiral and the axis at the macro level.
Other is.  Self must struggle to exist.

- Brian George

Offline Nick

  • Rishi
  • ******
  • Posts: 1540
  • Life Branches.
Re: Quantum Physics: personal observations
« Reply #3 on: April 05, 2007, 11:26:14 AM »
Needless to say that when you do experience it, you will be privy to awareness to which an entire physical life is as one breath.  The spiral and the axis at the macro level.

I used to go the beach to meditate on the ocean waves and breath in harmony with them. It had an effect on my mind that often made me feel "as if" I was privy to awareness to which an entire physical life is as one breath. Of course as far as I could see it was mostly in my mind. Still, it was powerful esp. when I watched the sun set on the ocean while stoned, very awesome.
"As long as we confuse the myriad forms of the divine lila with reality, without perceiving the unity of Brahman underlying all these forms, we are under the spell of maya..."
 -Fritjof Capra, The Tao of Physics: An Exploration of the Parallels between Modern Physics and Eastern Mysticism

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk