Yes Ang, you are absolutely correct. Although it also wise to keep an eye on previous solutions.
I have only got through half of that interview, but it looks good to me. Ellen had been reading that book by Ami whoever, and I have also skimmed some of it - not a pleasant read really, but there you go. Generally I felt Florinda had a better vibe than some of the others, and I like what she is saying so far as I read this interview.
Glad you mentioned that Amy's book wasn't a pleasant read. Personally, I couldn't get through the whole thing, largely because I kept *seeing* what amounted to a work of fiction. I don't mean that the events Amy described didn't happen (I'm very sure they did). What read like fiction to me were her impressions and perceptions of those events.
Obviously any writer can only bring her own perceptions to a work of alleged non-fiction, but so much of it read like a "victim" mentality - and while I don't deny that CC was no doubt an arse in his final days on earth, I also think that Amy's book just illustrated that those closest to him were perhaps the most "failed" of all - in the sense that they were attached to the leader rather than taking the l eader's message and running with it (literally running!).
I realize this may not be a popular opinion, but it just seemed to me that so much of what went on in that "cult" toward the end was more the result of the "followers" rather than the leader. CC's whole "message" could be boiled down to a few sentences: remove all energy hooks, walk the earth in freedom, and dream otherworlds beyond this one as a means to create/discover one's own path to the infinite self.
What I found appalling about Amy's book was the realization that CC's closest "followers" had seemingly done NONE of those things. Okay - maybe that's just human nature. But to then write a book about how CC was "controlling" all of them (in essence that's what it was saying), seemed rather like admitting one's own total and abject failure to grok the message as a result of being too blinded by the messenger.
No particular point. Just wanted to toss some comments into the mix, since I found Amy's book to be enlightening - but far more about the women themselves, rather than about CC. I'm not defending him - not in the least. I just think that Amy and the others really needed to look at their own attachments to their belief systems as the key to their freedom. The only thing controlling them and holding them there... was their own attachments.
Just venting...
Thanks for listening.