i don't blame you
a bunch of old fartz "archetypes"

i can' say i'd blame any one
Michael what do you see as a worthy purpose
The way i read it is possible two sides
one for those who pass through
the other for those who don't
i am sure it reads differently on both sides
my understanding is that people lack the depth "of time " built " upon time "
and archetype built upon symbol
to progression of symbols in time as based within archetypes
same as always "lack of lateral understanding"
to piece together components which are not anchored in linear motion
its for me no different than say the indian paloton to understand
you would have to be standing embedded within the description