I watched a bit of CNN's coverage of Irma's activities. All I can say, is that Trump has delivered apparently a massive blow to journalism as well. These people are selling now emotions rather than news. There was an endless chatter about what may happen, what could transpire, etc. All that while the storm was over 200 miles out to the sea.
Sheer bollocks.
I want to clarify my agreement about what Trump initiated with his concept of "fake news". With that I agree, and I believe in the end it will create denial and disbelief in times we should really be paying attention. If I thought he was clever enough, I'd think he was a genius to have set that up.
I just watched a little of the live CNN coverage. That sensational reporting, full of hyperbole, always goes on with these storms - the great anticipation, and wanting to be "live" on the scene before the storm blows them off their feet. On the one hand. On the other, the 2 journalists manning the thing right now are on the wrong side of Florida to be seeing much action. The forecast was originally ultra-concerned about the East Coast of Florida, though they qualified that, given the width of the storm, the West side would see havoc too. The two CNN guys right now are on the Eastside.
But Irma stayed longer over Cuba than they anticipated, and the track altered a few advisories ago, to the West side. So it's the opposite of what they originally predicted: the West side is going to get the worst, though indeed the East side will see dangerous effects too. If I was placing my journalists at the "hot" spots right now, it would be Key West, Naples, Fort Myers, and on Sunday proper, Tampa. (Again, not to say that the East won't feel disastrous effects.)
At the 5am advisory, this could all change again.