~
Here's a link to an article of how we may have managed to get where we are:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=10279Listed below here are some comments from another discussion group on where we may be heading:
I have some bad news about the economy. The rescue plan that the Bush Administration is planning and that Congress is deliberating this weekend is not going to work. When the plan was announced, the market picked up and we had what can be called "irrational exuberance" by investors. The stock market soared and the week ended less than 100 points lower than it began.
The plan asks for $700 billion of bad mortgage loans to be purchased by the US government and held until the housing market stabilizes and the government can sell those mortgages for, hopefully, a profit. Sounds good, right? These banks that are being dragged down by these bad debts can unload them on the US government and then proceed with a healthier balance sheet. Taxpayers will need to pay for the funds to buy these bad loans from the banks, but when the homes are resold in 10-15 years at a profit, then that profit will be returned to the US taxpayer. So far, sounds good.
Here's the problem: which banks are going to get to unload their bad loans? Is the US Treasury going to allow ALL banks to unload their bad mortgages, or just those banks that are in trouble (i.e., banks like Washington Mutual). Is there going to be a limit on how much bad debt each individual bank can unload on the American taxpayer? Citibank, for example, has hundreds of billions of dollars in potentially bad debt -- can Citibank unload all of its hundreds of billions of dollars or just 50 billion, or 100 billion? If the limits are set too high, then only a few banks will be allowed to participate before the program runs out of money and the Treasury has to go back to Congress to ask for more money. Set it too low and banks won't be able to clear enough of their bad debts to change their balance sheets.
But there are two problems that are even more serious:
1. About 60% of the mortgages made during 2005-2007 in California were so-called option loans. This means that the buyer put no money down and paid a very low teaser rate. The buyer had the option of paying (a) a monthly payment composed of both principal and interest or (b) a monthly payment of interest only. Those option mortgages are set to reset in the next couple of months. Many of those homes are going to go into foreclosure. What is going to happen to the housing market when these new foreclosures hit? We'll be back in the same situation we are in now. The rescue plan does NOTHING to take care of foreclosures or appraisals or the housing market.
2. Credit default swaps. I think I may have given an explanation of credit default swaps earlier, but it's a bet (called a "hedge") that a certain institution will or will not fail. It's a bet. AIG was heavily involved in credit default swaps. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were heavily involved in credit default swaps. Once the US took over Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and AIG, owners of those credit default swaps were put on notice that they had approximately 30 days to redeem that paper. The takeover of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae occurred on September 7. That makes October 7 the 30th day anniversary when those credit default swaps will be required to be auctioned off. THE AMOUNT OF MONEY THAT THESE INVESTMENT BANKS HAVE INVESTED IN CREDIT DEFAULT SWAPS IS 3X WHAT THEY HAVE INVESTED IN "TOXIC" MORTGAGES. THREE TIMES! It is estimated that there are $3 trillion in credit default swaps that are going to have to be redeemed.
This is why we are not out of the woods yet. The Bush Administration rescue plan will give us some time to try to figure out what to do, but it's pretty clear that if the Bush Administration is going to bail out toxic mortgages, then they are going to bail out credit default swaps (which have no real collateral). That means the bailout plans could end up costing American taxpayers as much as $5 trillion. $5 trillion! This bailout plan requires the US debt to be raised to $11 trillion. The credit default swaps could add 40% more to the national debt. We are bankrupting our economy. Taxes on everyone will have to be raised. And none of this takes into account the rising number of baby boomers who will be retiring and getting Social Security and Medicare in the next 5 years. We won't have money for health care plans, for infrastructure projects, and we may not even have enough money for our national defense. Whether our economy collapses this year or in 2010-2012, it will collapse because there isn't any money to pay for these bailouts without increasing taxes on businesses and individuals by at least 40%. In other words, look at your paycheck, identify the amount of money withheld for Federal income taxes and multiply that by 4 -- that is how much will be withheld from your paycheck in 2 years, whether McCain or Obama is in the White House.
By the way, from what I've read, the reason this mother of all bailouts was needed is because CHINA refused to inject any more money in the US treasury on Wednesday night.
pipa.com/
z