My view is based on infinity, and infinity has no limits, which i suppose can be argued against, but it is functional to my point of view. This statement by Florinda from the eagles gift has infinity at its core, and if you see that it relates to the other self.
Florinda:
Florinda explained that when she or her peers talked about time, they were not referring to something which is measured by the movement of a clock. Time is the essence of attention. The Eagle's emanations are made out of time, and properly, when one enters into any aspect of the other self, one is becoming acquainted with time.
She said that the wheel of time is like a state of heightened awareness which is part of the other self- just as the left side awareness is part of the self of everyday life. Florinda said that that state could physically be described as a tunnel of infinite length and width; a tunnel with reflective furrows.
Every furrow is infinite, and there are infinite numbers of them. Living creatures are compulsorily made, by the force of life, to gaze into one furrow. To gaze into it means to be trapped by it; to live that furrow.
Florinda asserted that what warriors call will belongs to the wheel of time. It is something like the runner of a vine, or an intangible tentacle which all of us possess. She said that a warrior's final aim is to learn to focus it on the wheel of time in order to make it turn.
(nemo) Infinite frames of time, will and intent, are aspects of my view. Now you have slipped in things like fantasy and no sane person and so on which are judgments and positioning from a point of view that you have and maintain, which is also an assemblage point position you are taking.
Michael said:
It appears to hinge on two arguments:
1. That there is an essential, inherent link point, via the AP between an individual and the earth.
(nemo) Each individual frame of time only has one energetic center to it's particular moment, and that includes the earth. If I bring us back to the shed example, the earth and the shed are the same thing, just because we categorize what we see into objects, there is no inherent difference between the shed and the earth. When we talk assemblage point, in my view we are the assemblage point, and the AP of the individual can expand to infinity, which includes more than just the earth.
2. That an active double has the power to influence the much larger being, the earth, through this link.
I have stated before that the double is connected to everything and everyone in a more direct way, and this is where the element of will comes into play. When you Michael acknowledge that there are controllers, on this earth I must admit there are, but I also know they have an energetic counterpart/double and through that mechanism for lack of a better term I can wield some influence on their strangle hold they have on the earth I walk on. I will a movement in the wheel of time to timelines where they have less and less say.
I know this for a fact in my own experience, because I have come from a timeline that was much hasher than the one I am on now. Though that is a point that is hard to prove.
I don't think you can use the argument that an individual is only influencing an 'earth' that exists with its own AP. Obviously my 'personal' earth, which is part of my own AP, can be influenced by me - I may even be able, were I sufficiently adept, to steer a path through possibilities existing within the earth's aura. But if humanity found the next level of powerful weapon that could, and did, disintegrate the earth itself, every sorcerer travelling through the aura of the earth would have their existence destroyed. Beyond my 'known' or even the margins of my 'unknown', there is an unknowable entity within which I exist, which I label 'earth'.
Like I said there is an infinity out there, and I am sure that there are timelines that the earth was is and always has been blown up. That is just a few of an infinity of possibilities available. Anyway this last statement by you is more in line with you stating your view again, which again I must say is relevant, more to you than to me.
Just because DJ could replay the leaf falling for CC, doesn't say anything about the earth itself - it only speaks of the ability to retrieve a 'frame' as you say. But no sane person would want to live for eternity within the storage of their own frames, as a refuge.
The leaf example was to show that frames of time existed out of linear time, and could be utilized. You are now are using frames of time as a reference, and that reference is from language that I use, and shows the importance of seeing everything as static moments in time that can be accessed.
What I am an advocate for is that beings become aware of the totality of the self and that is synonymous with being complete, being complete avails a singularity of fluid potentials and conscious choices.
