I am working on a word document that I will cut and paste. The difficulty is that each view is true to its natural assemblage point position. So if someone from the the first attention perspective, is communicating with a second attention person, each set of beliefs they both hold as an operating system are true to them, but they don't sit properly, even logically in the each others views and beliefs. The same is true with with the third attentions beliefs/view. I deal daily with a first attention person in my life, I can see the boundary of beliefs that create her world, and when talking with second attention individuals again their boundary of beliefs are apparent. Each view has it's working operational field, each view is true to itself and those that operate within it.
My intent here was to place a map so to speak to what i believe is the operational field of the third attention. What works against that being grasped firstly is the energy one has at their call, and the other is the working system that each attention clings to by it's very nature. You emphasis the double the and how it can be engaged, how getting to it ensures the continuation of the self past death, quite and achievement. What one has as a belief of what the self is then would be an important aspect of this.
The first second and third attention have differing beliefs on what the self is. Then what is surviving, how it is, and where is it, and what it is engaging are all going to come down to the energy and beliefs of the attention one wields. Beliefs form alignment, so what one believes then is important.
I have said all this already in a few different ways in this thread, so what I am working on is going to be more comprehensive and will take some time. Though I think there is enough here for those that can to get it, to get it. Getting it means the spirit has descended and has agreed to to let an awareness engage aspects of the self not apparent to first and second attention views.
