Jahn:
With all due respect, I have an offer to make to you:
Let's each refrain in the future from making assumptions about what the other has done, how far down the rabbit hole the other has gone, what they have or have not created, how far the other has progressed? Okay? Deal?
Second, I accept, as they are, your opinions about me, and my beliefs, my perception, and me. However, I request your respect in the future, if not your acceptance (non-judgment). Repeated statements like this, "If you believe that, then you are in the wrong perception," are not conducive to further discussion with me. While I accept your opinion on this, it is not absolute, and whether I am wrong or not is not any of your business, really. What's right for you is not necessarily right for me. My acceptance, however, is not synonymous with agreeing to your opinions, nor tolerating them when they are judgmental of me, or make unwarranted assumptions about me.
For example, it doesn't matter whether you accept or agree to the idea that you creaate your own reality. My purpose here is to express myself and my ideas, test them out here. If you don't accept or agree, what's it to me? It truely matters not.
Third, since I have no control over creating your reality, your acceptance, or your agreement, what good would it do, how effective would it be, how impeccable would it be, for me to offer you proof of how I create my own reality? How much proof would it take to convince you? I submit it would be a waste of energy to even try. Further, it is entirely unnecessary. The proof is as clear as the nose on your face. But I can't make you notice it. Nor is it my concern. I care, and that's why I'm here. But, I can't force you to see it. Your choice.
Whatever you want to discuss, that's fine with me. I choose whether to continue to participate, and so do you.