Author Topic: The sermon of not-self  (Read 37 times)

Offline Firestarter

  • Ellen
  • Rishi
  • *
  • Posts: 14769
  • Love You ALL To The Moon and Back...
    • SIR
The sermon of not-self
« on: November 03, 2009, 07:48:18 AM »
The Sermon on the Not-Self Characteristic
  (Anattalakkhana Sutta, Samyutta Nikaya XXII, 59)

******************************************************* 
One of the most important, and hard to grasp, of all all Buddhist
teachings is the doctrine of anatta, or "no-self".  One of Sakyamuni
Buddha's teachings about the cause of suffering was that it was a
result of  false illusions about the self. The self, or soul, or "essential
person", was an illusion.  Thus Buddhism does not teach that "you"
are "soul" which is "reborn" (although certain forms of Hindu
 teaching may be understood in this way. Rather Buddhism teachers
the "Mind" and "Mindfulness" exist, and that there is a karmic continuity
between incarnations of mind. The link then is karmic, not essential.
The Anattalakkhana Sutta is a document from the Pali canon of Buddhist
scriptures in which the Buddha argues for this idea. 
 
*******************************************************

  I have heard that on one occasion the Blessed One was staying at
  Varanasi in the Game Refuge at Isipatana.  There he addressed the
  group of five monks:
 
  'The body, monks, is not self.  If the body were the self, this body
  would not lend itself to dis-ease.  It would be possible (to say) with
  regard to the body, "Let my body be thus.  Let my body not be thus." 
  But precisely because the body is not self, the body lends itself to
  dis-ease.  And it is not possible (to say) with regard to the body,
  "Let my body be thus.  Let my body not be thus."
 
  'Feeling is not self.... Perception is not self.... Mental processes
  are not self....
 
  'Consciousness is not self.  If consciousness were the self, this
  consciousness would not lend itself to dis-ease.  It would be possible
  (to say) with regard to consciousness, "Let my consciousness  be thus. 
  Let my consciousness not be thus."  But precisely because
  consciousness is not self, consciousness lends itself to dis-ease. 
  And it is not possible (to say) with regard to consciousness, "Let my
  consciousness be thus.  Let my consciousness not be thus."
 
  'How do you construe thus, monks--Is the body constant or inconstant?' 
  'Inconstant, Lord.'  'And is that which is inconstant easeful or
  stressful?'  'Stressful, Lord.'  'And is it fitting to regard what is
  inconstant, stressful, subject to change as:  "This is mine.  This is
  my self.  This is what I am"?'  'No, Lord.'
 
  '...Is feeling constant or inconstant?.... Is perception constant or
  inconstant?.... Are mental processes constant or inconstant?....
 
  'Is consciousness constant or inconstant?'  'Inconstant, Lord.'  'And
  is that which is inconstant easeful or stressful?'  'Stressful, Lord.' 
  'And is it fitting to regard what is inconstant, stressful, subject to
  change as:  "This is mine.  This is my self.  This is what I am"?' 
  'No, Lord.'
 
  'Thus, monks, any body whatsoever--past, future, or present; internal
  or external; blatant or subtle, common or sublime, far or near:  every
  body--is to be seen as it actually is with right discernment as: 
  "This is not mine.  This is not my self.  This is not what I am."
 
  'Any feeling whatsoever.... Any perception whatsoever.... Any mental
  processes whatsoever....
 
  'Any consciousness whatsoever--past, future, or present; internal or
  external; blatant or subtle, common or sublime, far or near:  every
  consciousness--is to be seen as it actually is with right discernment
  as:  "This is not mine.  This is not my self.  This is not what I am."
 
  'Seeing thus, the instructed Noble disciple grows disenchanted with
  the body, disenchanted with feeling, disenchanted with perception,
  disenchanted with mental processes, and disenchanted with
  consciousness.  Disenchanted, he becomes dispassionate.  Through
  dispassion, he is released.  With release, there is the knowledge,
  "Released."  He discerns that, "Birth is depleted, the holy life
  fulfilled, the task done.  There is nothing further for this world."'
 
  That is what the Blessed Onesaid.  Glad at heart, the group of five
  monks delighted at his words.  And while this explanation was being
  given, the hearts of the group of five monks, through no clinging (not
  being sustained), were released from the mental effluents.
"A warrior doesn't seek anything for his solace, nor can he possibly leave anything to chance. A warrior actually affects the outcome of events by the force of his awareness and his unbending intent." - don Juan

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk