Author Topic: WE'RE STUFFED!!!  (Read 32082 times)

Offline Michael

  • Administrator
  • Rishi
  • ******
  • Posts: 18306
    • Michael's Music Page
Re: WE'RE STUFFED!!!
« Reply #1845 on: April 09, 2013, 09:15:57 PM »
I expect none of you know what is happening in Bangladesh, so I'll just offer you a quick update.

You know what has happened in the Arab Spring countries. Those which overthrew their dictators, are beginning to find the resilience of Islamic organisations coming into power. What began as a modern youth movement, inspired by technological social media, is gradually reverting to an Islamic fundamentalist power.

In Bangladesh, something totally different has happened.

Historically, there were Bangladesh Islamic organisations which sided with Pakistan in the 1952 war of independence. These organisations still exist, and are now very strong. In Feburary this year, when a war crime court found a leading figure of one of these organisations (Jamaat-e-Islami) guilty of rape and murder for his part back in the war, he was a given life sentence instead of the death penalty. He gave a provocative victory speech right there in the court.

That very day, people began moving into Shahbag Square in Dhaka, the capital of Bangladesh. The numbers swelled to over a million. They were demanding the death penalty for this man. But more than that, Bangladesh's 30 and under make up 35% of the population, and many of these in the cities are anti-Islamicist. The difference with this uprising, is that it isn't against a dictatorial government, it is against Islamicism itself. There are young Muslims who are taking to the streets demanding the end of Jammat. This hasn't happened anywhere else in the Muslim world yet, although it might soon happen in Egypt.

The Islamicists reacted violently, pulling their own mega crowds and attacking minorities like Hindus. They organised a huge march to demand the death penalty for anti-Islamic speech and murdered one of the main bloggers of the secularists.

The youth again moved into Shahbag Square, and even closed down Dhaka itself. The country is split.

The split is also political. The Islamicists are aligned with the main opposition party, while the secular youth are aligned with the government. But the government has arrested some leading bloggers for anti-Islamic rhetoric.

This country is now being watched closely by the world, as it is about a Muslim youth resisting the trend towards Islamic fundamentalism in their country. And the youth are growing in percentage of the voting public. Of course there are as many young Muslims on the Islamicist side also.

erik

  • Guest
Re: WE'RE STUFFED!!!
« Reply #1846 on: April 09, 2013, 10:43:25 PM »

Offline Michael

  • Administrator
  • Rishi
  • ******
  • Posts: 18306
    • Michael's Music Page
Re: WE'RE STUFFED!!!
« Reply #1847 on: April 10, 2013, 05:24:11 PM »
Unthinkable thoughts about Syria

Interesting Juhani - Syria has gone off the radar lately, as it has become so entrenched. Except for the chemical weapon issue.

erik

  • Guest
Re: WE'RE STUFFED!!!
« Reply #1848 on: April 10, 2013, 08:16:17 PM »
Interesting Juhani - Syria has gone off the radar lately, as it has become so entrenched. Except for the chemical weapon issue.

6,000 people got killed there only in March. Now the strongest rebel faction (al-Nusra front) announced unification with al-Qaeda in Iraq. Here we are: 10 years after the invasion of Iraq we have ever strenghtening and increasingly legitimised al-Qaeda operating in Syria and Iraq where it was not even present before 2003.

erik

  • Guest
Re: WE'RE STUFFED!!!
« Reply #1849 on: April 25, 2013, 05:44:41 PM »
Syria: 11th-century minaret of Great Umayyad Mosque of Aleppo destroyed

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/10016169/Syria-11th-century-minaret-of-Great-Umayyad-Mosque-of-Aleppo-destroyed.html

The 11th-century minaret of the Great Umayyad Mosque of Aleppo, one of the world's oldest and most important, has been destroyed by shellfire as the Syrian war consumes the country's vast repository of historic sites.


The minaret dated back to 1090AD. (ALAMY)



Oppositions activists in the city said the minaret was hit by tank shells fired as part of a regime assault on the mosque, which was originally built in 715 by the Umayyad dynasty and which fell into rebel hands last week.

The minaret itself dated to 1090 AD.

Video posted by the Aleppo Media Centre showed a pile of rubble in the corner of the Great Mosque's courtyard, sprouting twisted metal spikes, where the minaret once stood. The colonnades and arches of the courtyard itself lie scorched, broken, and pockmarked with bullet and shell-holes.

The collapse of the minaret was also reported by state media, which said it had been blown up by Jabhat al-Nusra, the al-Qaeda-linked group fighting with the rebels. It did not explain why a militant Sunni group would destroy a historic Sunni mosque.

The collapse also appeared to happen in the middle of a battle, with rebel soldiers stationed inside the mosque in the middle of live fire. They were claimed to be from Liwa al-Tawhid, a more moderate though Sunni Islamist-aligned brigade largely drawn from the countryside around Aleppo, rather than from Jabhat al-Nusra.

The opposition Syrian National Coalition described the targeting of the minaret as "an indelible disgrace".

"The deliberate destruction of this minaret, under whose shadow Saladin, Seif al-Dawla al-Hamdani and Abu Tayeb Abdel Rahman al-Mutanabbi rested, is a crime against human civilisation," its statement said, naming the celebrated Crusade-era Muslim leader, the most celebrate Emir of Aleppo, and a tenth Century poet.

The mosque was first damaged in fighting last October, a few weeks after the Old Souq of Aleppo, which it faces across a narrow alley used for months by snipers, was largely destroyed by fire.

Among Syria's other UNESCO-listed world heritage sites, the great Crusader castle of Crac des Chevaliers and the ancient Roman ruins of Palmyra have also been damaged.

The regime has slowly lost ground across Aleppo's old city, but still occupies the citadel, first occupied in the Third Millennium BC, which overlooks the city and whose gateway was blown up.

It continues to occupy the Christian quarter of the city. Two bishops, Bishop Boulos Yaziji of the Greek Orthodox church and Bishop Yohanna Ibrahim, a Syriac Orthodox, who were kidnapped by an unknown militia, remained missing, despite reports of their release on Tuesday evening.

"That report was a mistake," Bishop Luca, of the Greek Orthodox church in Damascus, told The Daily Telegraph. He was unable to explain how it happened.

In Rome, Pope Francis added his voice to calls for their release. One report, which Bishop Luca was unable to confirm, said the kidnappers identified themselves as Chechen.

Although losing ground in the north, the regime continued to regain lost territory further south. It captured the town of Otaiba, which rebels said was a key link in the supply of weapons to opposition forces fighting in the eastern suburbs of the capital, Damascus.

It was also pressing its assault on Qusayr, a key town between Homs and the Lebanese border.

Offline Michael

  • Administrator
  • Rishi
  • ******
  • Posts: 18306
    • Michael's Music Page
Re: WE'RE STUFFED!!!
« Reply #1850 on: April 28, 2013, 09:26:08 AM »
"Friends and Colleagues:

Earlier this week President Barack Obama set the tone for his second term, and what a note he struck!  The president vowed to fight climate disruption and make the United States a leader in clean energy. But just as important, he celebrated the value of citizen action, from Seneca Falls to Selma to Stonewall, and underscored that standing up for what is morally right is a profound act of patriotism. In the president's own words, "You and I, as citizens, have the obligation to shape the debates of our time, not only with the votes we cast, but the voices we lift in defense of our most ancient values and enduring ideas."

The Sierra Club could not agree more strongly. Some issues demand the strongest defensible response. That's why the Sierra Club's Board of Directors voted enthusiastically to permit an act of civil disobedience in order to hold President Obama to his words and elevate the discussion about climate disruption, the defining issue of our time.

This peaceful resistance will be the first in the Sierra Club's 120-year history. Specifically, the Board has suspended the Club's policy against civil disobedience to allow, for one time, a select team of Club leaders and prominent Sierra Club supporters to face arrest during a peaceful protest, in partnership with 350.org.

Why civil disobedience?

The decision to actively, deliberately, and peacefully disobey specific laws or rules can play an important role in any social movement, just as other tactics such as lobbying, electoral work, and public education play important roles. Civil disobedience reflects core American values first articulated by Henry David Thoreau and used effectively by abolitionists, suffragists, and in the civil rights movement by the Reverend Martin Luther King, Jr. and others.

Why now?

Our planet needs us. The Sierra Club and its environmental allies are, at long last, beginning to achieve significant success in the fight against climate disruption. But we have so much more still to do -- from defeating the tar sands pipeline and coal and LNG exports to going all-in on clean energy. To let the corrupting influence of fossil fuel billionaires undermine that progress now would be inexcusable.

This nonviolent resistance will be one part of an all-out effort to challenge President Obama and policymakers to prioritize climate disruption and make addressing this threat part of the administration's legacy, particularly in the first 100 days of the president's second term.

Note that the board has not changed the Sierra Club's official prohibition on civil disobedience but has instead granted a one-time exception for this action. No other act of civil disobedience has been approved.

We applaud the Board of Directors for empowering this organization to tackle the enormous challenge ahead of us, and we look forward to helping President Obama stay on course in moving our nation from dirty, dangerous fossil fuels to clean energy. We thank you all in advance for the grassroots power you will bring in 2013.

Allison and Mike"

http://action.sierraclub.org/site/MessageViewer?em_id=275045.0&dlv_id=231579

erik

  • Guest
Re: WE'RE STUFFED!!!
« Reply #1851 on: May 04, 2013, 06:36:39 PM »

erik

  • Guest
Re: WE'RE STUFFED!!!
« Reply #1852 on: May 06, 2013, 11:38:51 PM »
How the human terrain of the conflicyt looks like. For me, Mali resembles greatly a failing state.

Offline Michael

  • Administrator
  • Rishi
  • ******
  • Posts: 18306
    • Michael's Music Page
Re: WE'RE STUFFED!!!
« Reply #1853 on: May 07, 2013, 12:06:46 AM »
That was very informative Juhani.

Offline Michael

  • Administrator
  • Rishi
  • ******
  • Posts: 18306
    • Michael's Music Page
Re: WE'RE STUFFED!!!
« Reply #1854 on: May 11, 2013, 11:00:16 AM »
The average daily level of carbon dioxide has passed the 400 parts per million, as measured at Mauna Loa.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/11/science/earth/carbon-dioxide-level-passes-long-feared-milestone.html?_r=1&
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/11/science/earth/carbon-dioxide-level-passes-long-feared-milestone.html?_r=1&

erik

  • Guest
Re: WE'RE STUFFED!!!
« Reply #1855 on: May 13, 2013, 04:13:22 PM »
The average daily level of carbon dioxide has passed the 400 parts per million, as measured at Mauna Loa.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/11/science/earth/carbon-dioxide-level-passes-long-feared-milestone.html?_r=1&
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/11/science/earth/carbon-dioxide-level-passes-long-feared-milestone.html?_r=1&

The title of the post is perfect. There is beauty in its precision.

There we are with all our knowledge and wisdom. We realise fully what a foolish path has been chosen, and yet...vast majority of us - humans - are so completely helpless with ourselves. There is such an impregnable wall that blocks all attempts to follow the voice of higher Self.

Offline Michael

  • Administrator
  • Rishi
  • ******
  • Posts: 18306
    • Michael's Music Page
Re: WE'RE STUFFED!!!
« Reply #1856 on: May 13, 2013, 07:14:43 PM »
There is such an impregnable wall that blocks all attempts to follow the voice of higher Self.

That's a big leap - simple common sense would suffice.
But you are right of course.

erik

  • Guest
Re: WE'RE STUFFED!!!
« Reply #1857 on: May 14, 2013, 03:50:21 PM »
That's a big leap - simple common sense would suffice.

I would say that common sense or its lack are both based on deeply held beliefs and values. Changing these is immensely difficult. My experience tells me that it is nothing short of shedding the outer - most superficial - persona and moving closer to one's core.

erik

  • Guest
Re: WE'RE STUFFED!!!
« Reply #1858 on: May 31, 2013, 04:34:12 PM »
Drones are not part of the strategy, but the strategy.

Financial Times May 30, 2013.

Viewed from Pakistan, America’s war on terror is not yet over
By Ahmed Rashid

President Barack Obama’s speech last week on counterterrorism may have proposed the end of one open-ended war for the US but it also signalled the start of a new war – albeit more restrictive and contained. The use of drones in the first got out of hand, but there is no guarantee yet that they will not do so in the new one.

The fallacy and danger of the use of drones is not that they kill terrorists covertly. It is a good thing, after all, that they have decimated al-Qaeda. It is that, rather than being just one tactic in a wider US counterterrorism strategy, drones have become the strategy itself.

To his credit, Mr Obama’s speech disentangled him from the drone era and the criticism that flowed at home and abroad. He has finally opened the door to enabling the US tentatively to embrace a broader counterterrorism policy.

Nonetheless, his first term will probably be defined by the widespread use of drone warfare against terrorists – not a legacy the liberal lawyer-turned-president would appreciate. “America is at a crossroads,” he said this month in Washington. “This war, like all wars, must end.” He went on to outline a range of restrictions in the drone campaign to make their use more legitimate in the eyes of the US public, the legal fraternity and the world; and to introduce oversight of who is targeted and why.

This would – according to the many US pundits who praised the speech – help us forget the image of the US president at breakfast ticking names off a list of terrorists needing to be taken out that morning. Instead, we now have a layered process for the selection of targets, with Mr Obama saying the threat from al-Qaeda has diminished, justifying new criteria and guidelines for deploying drones against those who pose a “continuing imminent threat” to the US.

So the era of open war against terrorists everywhere, begun under George W. Bush, is over – officially, at least. If only this speech had been made before drones raised such constitutional conundrums and created such widespread anti-Americanism in the Muslim world.

For the rest of the world, the issue is not the use of drones per se but what they signify about US policy. Can the White House honestly claim it has spent as much time furthering diplomatic efforts to end war in Afghanistan, or enlisting global support for rebuilding failing states, or providing aid and expertise to crumbling societies – all of which would show the world that it had a grand counterterrorism strategy not represented by a piece of machinery – as it has spent finding targets for drones?

The real tragedy of the war against terrorism, which Mr Obama has merely redefined and which will continue, is that he has yet to spell out a strategy, a series of steps to counter and combat the causes of burgeoning militancy in the Islamic world and increasingly among a small minority of Muslims in Europe.

Drones will not help America deal with the symptoms of terrorism nor teach societies how to eradicate those symptoms and move on. These newfangled lethal toys, in some countries, are the only face of US foreign policy. As Mr Obama said in his speech, they will now be used not in a boundless “global war on terror” but “rather as a series of persistent, targeted efforts to dismantle specific networks”. Mr Bush never intended to become involved in years of nation-building abroad. He reluctantly accepted it as a consequence of the wars he fought in Afghanistan and Iraq. Mr Obama has not until now even considered nation-building, or dealing with the symptoms of terrorism, a subject worthy of a speech. The excellent speech he delivered in Cairo at the start of his first term, about reaching out to the Muslim world, is long forgotten.

Yet the president’s latest words do offer tantalising glimpses of a return to the Cairo approach, which could mean that he will offer measures of economic, social and political support to countries beset with terrorism – and a wider strategy to combat terrorism. He needs to do so if he wants to build a better legacy than he has so far.

What concerns the president most of all is overcoming the legal and constitutional morass that the drones have created for the US, and to offer plausible legal logic for their continued use. Mr Obama’s speech constituted a significant effort to do that. He has reduced the burden for himself at home but he has yet to chart a new course for the world.

And what about the rest of us, who have to live under the shadow of the drones (I reside in Pakistan, for example); and, worse still, under the drone-based propaganda and anti-western and anti-democratic sentiment that both extremists and moderates now use in Muslim societies to whip up public frenzy?

For us, at the bottom of the pile as far as the White House is concerned, we will have to wait for another presidential speech that offers a wider strategy to counter extremism than just pounding it with missiles.

The writer is an author of several books including ‘Descent into Chaos’ and ‘Pakistan on the Brink’

Offline Nichi

  • Global Moderator
  • Rishi
  • ******
  • Posts: 24262
Re: WE'RE STUFFED!!!
« Reply #1859 on: May 31, 2013, 09:56:10 PM »
Recent Storms Highlight Flaws In Top U.S. Weather Model
Mar 15, 2013

http://insideclimatenews.org/breaking-news/20130315/recent-storms-highlight-flaws-top-us-weather-model

The U.S., which pioneered the groundbreaking science of weather forecasting using mathematical simulations of the atmosphere, has fallen behind other nations when it comes to the accuracy of its global forecasting model. The consequences could be dire for people in harm's way if the U.S. is less prepared for extreme weather and climate events.
 
As Sandy was spinning its way northward from the Caribbean Sea, it was the model run by the European Center for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) that sounded the earliest alarm. The European Center’s model projected about a week in advance that the storm would make an unprecedented and devastating left hook into the Mid-Atlantic coastline, wreaking havoc the likes of which parts of the East Coast had not seen in modern times.
 
The top-of-the-line U.S. weather forecasting model, known as the Global Forecasting System (GFS) didn’t catch on to that worst-case scenario until the storm was closer to making landfall in the U.S. That delay contributed to a large degree of uncertainty in the forecasts until just three to four days before the storm hit.
 
Fast-forward four months to the Feb. 7 blizzard that paralyzed the Northeast by dumping up to 40 inches of snow. Again, it was the European Center’s model that proved to be the most accurate, giving local officials throughout southern New England ample time to prepare, while the U.S. model vacillated between varying projections of the storm’s path, strength, and snowfall amounts.
 
NOAA has struggled to stem the financial bleeding from long-delayed and mismanaged weather and climate satellite programs. The end result is that NOAA’s operational weather capabilities are not keeping pace with those of other countries


Juhani, I thought you'd find interesting the difference between the 2 models - there is a case in point right now coming into the Gulf of Mexico.

The GFS puts landfall in the northwestern corner of Florida: the Euro puts landfall at Mississippi/Louisianna coastline. Big difference for the concerned parties.

Not here, not there, but everywhere - always right before your eyes.
~Hsin Hsin Ming

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk